I also have to concur with Gary's comment about the 152 - "two lightweight people."
Not only that, but it's also a bit "cozy" in there.
I've never been in a 152. I booked one once, but was never in it. It got bumped up to a 172. As the instructor put it "If you want a 152, go get yourself A JOCKEY."

As for getting a light sport plane - well, there seem to be two schools of thought on those. I've had someone relate an experience with a hard landing and damaging the landing gear. From this he concluded that LSAs are built light and are therefore somewhat fragile compared to say, a 172 or a Warrior. Potentially, they can cost a lot of money in repair bills... so my initial thought was that on top of requiring pristine clear weather to fly in, you'd be frustrated by the amount of hangar time needed to keep up with it. Murphy's Law suggests that when the shop is ready to release the plane to you, it will be on a rainy day that is unsuitable for sport flying. When the weather is more amenable, you will not be available. Yes, we need to work for a living, and probably as well need to work to pay off that aircraft loan, insurance and stack of repair bills as well. The weather will be beautiful on Wednesday and poopy on saturday and sunday for weeks on end... right?
The other argument is that sport planes are in fact built quite strong - they MUST be built strong, for they are constructed of light airframes.
For me, the bottom line is that I do not want to be the first kid on the block to own one, but would carefully look at it. Tried and true is good, and frankly I do not live in sunny California, but rather live in the Hudson Valley area of New York and frequently fly in Southern New England.
So for now, there is no verdict on either, for there is a fatal atraction that's holding me fast, how can I escape its irresistable grasp?
